{"id":3966,"date":"2023-02-26T17:33:03","date_gmt":"2023-02-26T06:33:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/?page_id=3966"},"modified":"2025-10-09T10:09:17","modified_gmt":"2025-10-08T23:09:17","slug":"the-poison-of-polygamy","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/the-poison-of-polygamy\/","title":{"rendered":"The Poison of Polygamy &#8211; a social novel"},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Cover.jpeg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3949\" width=\"655\" height=\"655\" srcset=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Cover.jpeg 600w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Cover-300x300.jpeg 300w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Cover-150x150.jpeg 150w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Cover-100x100.jpeg 100w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 655px) 100vw, 655px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">Now a bilingual publication<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The first novel of the Chinese Australian experience was written before the fall of the Qing Empire, albeit by a die-hard republican. The rediscovery of this long-forgotten Chinese-language novel around a century after it first appeared in printoffers a rare window onto nineteenth century Australia from a local Chinese perspective. Not to mention valuable insights into the emotional lives of the gold seekers and the wider social concerns of Chinese-Australians at the time of writing. It is also to be valued for offering a Chinese perspective on the experience of migration more broadly, and on the challenges of migration for families and communities.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/sydneyreviewofbooks.com\/essay\/wong-shee-ping\/\">Wong Shee&nbsp;Ping<\/a>, the author of this highly entertaining read, serialised&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;in Melbourne\u2019s&nbsp;<em>Chinese Times<\/em>&nbsp;newspaper, in roughly weekly instalments,&nbsp;from&nbsp;June 1909 to December 1910.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftn1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a><\/p>\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-large is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--756x1024.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-3947\" width=\"558\" height=\"755\" srcset=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--756x1024.jpg 756w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--222x300.jpg 222w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--768x1040.jpg 768w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--1134x1536.jpg 1134w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping--1512x2048.jpg 1512w, https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/02\/Wong-Shee-Ping-.jpg 1533w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 558px) 100vw, 558px\" \/><figcaption class=\"wp-element-caption\">The author &#8211; Wong Shee Ping<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The story is a morality tale that follows the highs and lows in the life of anti-hero Wong Sheung Hong, his virtuous wife, and the many characters he comes in contact with, during times spent in southern China, in south-eastern Australia and on route between the two. The novel offers a dramatic and detailed account of Wong\u2019s humble beginnings, his not always moral efforts in life and his eventual rise in prosperity in Australia before returning to his long-suffering wife in his home village.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The author of&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy&nbsp;<\/em>was Wong Shee Ping, brother of the manager of the Pekin Cafe (see&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/11-pekin-cafe-fork\/\">No.11<\/a>) and son of&nbsp;a gold digger and Melbourne businessman from the See Yap region of southern China. Written therefore by a direct descendent of a gold digger,&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;provides a fictional view of Victoria\u2019s goldrush history, along with some historical inaccuracies and anachronisms, as in many works of fiction. Nevertheless, the work offers a rare insight into the Chinese experience and community memory of that history. The novel is a document of its times and was created with a distinct political and social agenda to mobilise and shape Chinese Australian communities in ways favouring the revolutionary nationalist cause.&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The novel tells the story of a typical divided-family of the mid-19<sup>th<\/sup>&nbsp;century. Histories of the males who moved often neglect the family\u2019s members, and especially the wives, who did not.&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;is rare therefore in its&nbsp;focus on both the challenges male immigrants experienced in the Australia of that time, and on the implications of their departure for the families they left behind. Although much of the story highlights the importance of fraternity and clan ties for successful settlement in Australia, the novel also portrays a wife left behind in China who suffers from loneliness and sacrifices her life for the sake of the patriarchal family into which she married.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftn2\"><sup>[2]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;The second half of the novel traces how arrivals from China transitioned from the tough life on the goldfields to becoming successful merchants, engaged in trade between Australia and China. Still, their lives were complicated by traditional demands that they produce heirs to carry on the patrilineal family name. This often served as justification for polygamy, or acquiring secondary wives, a troublesome practice that often led to disharmony in the family \u2013 and which lends the novel its title.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">The author, the novel, the newspaper, and the many readers who enjoyed&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;when it first appeared in print all merit a place in the social, political and literary history of contemporary Australia.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftn3\"><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;This is a place long denied not simply because the novel was written in Chinese but also because it was written in Literary Chinese, a form of writing that has now all but disappeared.<a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftn4\"><sup>[4]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;Even when such works have been translated, the translations often give the impression of a chunkiness or stiffness that the original does not deserve.&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;and its new generation of English readers is extremely fortunate in being able to gain this glimpse into the world of pre-Republican China and of the Chinese diaspora in Australian not only as an historical and literary curiosity but in a rigorous but readable translation that allows the imagination and the drama of the story to be fully appreciated and enjoyed. This is an Australian story and one that all Australians can now enjoy and treasure, both those with and without Chinese ancestry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Wong Shee Ping,&nbsp;<em><a href=\"https:\/\/sydneyuniversitypress.com\/products\/9781743326022?_pos=1&amp;_sid=49dc8c02a&amp;_ss=r\">The Poison of Polygamy &#8211; A Social Novel<\/a><\/em>, translated by Ely Finch, and introduction by Mei-fen Kuo and Michael Williams (Sydney University Press, 2019).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<hr class=\"wp-block-separator has-alpha-channel-opacity\"\/>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftnref1\"><sup>[1]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;This article is a modified version of the historical introduction to&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>, \u2018Why is Polygamy Poisonous?\u2019 by Mei-fen Kuo and Michael Williams, pp.11-35.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftnref2\"><sup>[2]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;For a discussion of the women left behind see Williams, M., 2021. Holding Up Half the Family,&nbsp;<em>Journal of Chinese Overseas<\/em>&nbsp;17.1, pp.179-195.&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/17932548-12341438\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/17932548-12341438<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftnref3\"><sup>[3]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;The many much shorter pieces of literature appearing in Australian\u2019s Chinese language press since the 1890s are well documented in Haizhi Luo,&nbsp;Towards a Modern Diasporic Literary Tradition: The Evolution of Australian Chinese Language Fiction from 1894 to 1912&nbsp;(Master diss., University of New South Wales, 2017).<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\"><a href=\"applewebdata:\/\/BB6A5763-2CD8-4638-8BFA-3489F4A11F9E#_ftnref4\"><sup>[4]<\/sup><\/a>&nbsp;See Ely Finch\u2019s Translators Introduction in&nbsp;<em>The Poison of Polygamy<\/em>&nbsp;for a detailed explanation, pp.37-78.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The first novel of the Chinese Australian experience was written before the fall of the Qing Empire, albeit by a die-hard republican. The rediscovery of this long-forgotten Chinese-language novel around a century after it first appeared in printoffers a rare window onto nineteenth century Australia from a local Chinese perspective. Not to mention valuable insights &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/the-poison-of-polygamy\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;The Poison of Polygamy &#8211; a social novel&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-3966","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3966"}],"version-history":[{"count":8,"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4373,"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3966\/revisions\/4373"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/chinozhistory.org\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}